Not resolved
2.7
Details
Customer service
Discounts and Special Offers
Diversity of Products or Services
Ease of Use
Exchange, Refund and Cancellation Policy
Layout of Store
Location
Price Affordability
Product or Service Quality
Staff
Value for money
Warranty
Website
2 comments

What I dont get why are you getting rid of the price matching on the savings catcher. I think it's a bad idea.

There are a lot of people who use that app. Your not thinking about the consumer all you care about is money. You dont have to luve paycheck to paycheck. Well in the real world the customer s that use the app.

Has to save every penny they can. And dont tell me you did a survey about thus topic. When i know there has not been one done. Also what you dont consider is that not everyone has a checking account.

So theres changes are not fair. Why sont you start listen to the customers. But i guess no one dont care as long as your making your paycheck. Take this advice it just might help you realize the real world.

Ppen your eyes to the big picture. Stop being so closed minded and what to make all these changes. Before you actually do your homework about the consumers and thier opinions. You have upset a lot of customers.

You also think these changes are for the best for the company. Well your very wrong all its done is padding your pockets. So its time to do some soul searching if you remember how to. Stop letting your job title go to your head.

We are all still humans but people do forget at times.

All the changes in the stores dont benefit the employees or the customers. Its only benefitting the hire ips pockets.

Product or Service Mentioned: Walmart Savings Catcher Rewards Program.

Reason of review: Poor customer service.

Do You Have Something To Say ?
Write a review

Comments

You will be automatically registered on our site. Username and password will be sent to you via email.
Post Comment
Anonymous
#1668520

Wal-Mart got rid of the price matching because people kept trying to scam them by getting a price match on things that weren't exactly apples to apples or oranges to oranges.

Anonymous
#1667545

Good